Life ramblings and the journey through adoption.
Why? I ask this in a non-critical, supportive of everyone's right to make their own political decisions way. Just curious...
Narda believes (as I tend to as well), that Obama is a good "speachifier" and all that, but has little track record behind him - there's no proof that he's actually gotten anything accomplished.She (Narda) gets all riled up when people attack Hillary, because she thinks that people perceive strong women as bitches, and that pisses her off.That's the short short version.Hillary has proven that she can get stuff done, and, you know, she's a woman and all. And Obama? Nice guy, speaks well, but that's about it.
I agree with Narda about Hillary and if Hillary is the candidate I will whole-heartedly support her. I just dig Barack Obama a bit more and find substance in what he says and what he has done.Thanks for being open.
I agree about Obama. Ok, but the real reason I prefer Hillary is that she seemed comfortable on the Ellen show and Barack seemed out of his element. That's my twisted logic. :)
Ouch. Not so much on Hillary, but on Guiliani.I still prefer Obama.She might come off as a bitch, but I like that better than an overemotional woman.And, I like Obama alot.
Post a Comment